Do Intellectual Capital and Corporate Governance have Value Relevance to the Market Performance? Evidence from Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20961/akumulasi.v2i1.759Keywords:
corporate governance, intellectual capital, market performanceAbstract
We examine whether intellectual capital and corporate governance have value relevance to market performance. Intellectual capital is measured by VAIC™ (Pulic, 1998). We use annual report data from companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) and Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI) data from the Indonesian Institute for Corporate Governance (IICG) in the period of 2015–2019. Preliminary findings suggest that intellectual capital does not have value relevance to market performance, but corporate governance does have value relevance to market performance. This paper contributes to stakeholders in making economic decisions.
References
Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.004
Armstrong, C. S., Balakrishnan, K., & Cohen, D. (2012). Corporate governance and the information environment: Evidence from State Antitakeover Laws. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.06.005
Berzkalne, I. & E. Zelgalve. (2014). Intellectual capital and company value. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.934
Bharathi Kamath, G. (2008). Intellectual capital and corporate performance in Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 684-704. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810913221
Bowman, C., & Toms, S. (2010). Accounting for competitive advantage: The resource-based view of the firm and the labour theory of value. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.010
Braune, E., Sahut, J. M., & Teulon, F. (2020). Intangible capital, governance and financial performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119934
Carmeli, A. & Tishler, A. (2004). The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance. Strat. Mgmt. J., 25, 1257-1278. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.428
Goh, C. P. (2005). Intellectual capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(3), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930510611120
Chizari, M. H. , Mehrjardi, R. Z., Sadrabadib, M.M., and Mehrjardi, F. K. (2016). The impact of intellectual capitals of pharmaceutical companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange on their market performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30040-5
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301–325. http://www.jstor.org/stable/725104
Haksever, C., Chaganti, R., & Cook, R. G. (2004). A model of value creation: Strategic view. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000017968.21563.05
Hariyati, H., Subroto, W. T., Wahyudi, S. N. I., & Riyanto, Y. (2017). Influences of intellectual property and capital to the performance of the corporate image award winning companies in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(4), 595–602. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/5097
Hitt, M. a, Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069334
Indonesian Accounting Association. (2009). Financial accounting standards, PSAK No. 19: Intangible Financial Assets. Salemba Empat.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718812602
Kherismawati, N. P. E., Wiagustini, N. L. P., & Dewi, M. P. (2017). Profitabilitas dan leverage sebagai prediktor kebijakan dividen dan nilai perusahaan (Studi pada perusahaan manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Jagaditha, 3(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.22225/jj.3.1.126.94-108
Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., Mari, L., (2011). A Model for R&D performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 134 (1), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.018
Lestari, H. S.. (2017). Pengaruh intellectual capital terhadap kinerja perusahaan asuransi di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen, 21(3), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.24912/jm.v21i3.264
Lev, B. (2000). Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Brookings Institution Press.
Meek, G. K., & Gray, S. J. (1998). The value added statement: An innovation for U.S Companies? Accounting Horizons, 2(2), 69–88. https://www.proquest.com/openview/b416864cf4c26e8bd350bfde8b962d19/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=3330
Nuraina, E. (2012). Pengaruh kepemilikan institusional dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kebijakan hutang dan nilai perusahaan (Studi pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI untuk periode 2006- 2008. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi (JBE), 2(19), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v4n1.p51-70
Penrose, E.T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Basil Blackwell & Mott Ltd.
Pulic, A. (1998). Measuring the performance of intellectual potential (IP) in knowledge economy. International Conference Tiffany, & S. Jennifer (Eds.), 19th Annual National Business Conference. Degroote School of Business. https://www.bib.irb.hr/35384
Pulic, A. (2000). VAIC TM - an accounting tool for IC management. International Journal Technology Management, 20, 702-704. https://www.vaic-on.net
Riahi‐Belkaoui, A. (2003), Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms: A study of the resource‐based and stakeholder views. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(2), 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930310472839
Razali, W. A. A. W. M., & Arshad, R. (2014). Disclosure of corporate governance structure and the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.032
Sawarjuwono, T., & Prihatin Kadir, A. P. (2003). Intellectual capital: Perlakuan, pengukuran dan pelaporan (Sebuah library research). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 5(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.5.1.pp.%2035-57
Shahzad, A. M., Mousa, F. T., & Sharfman, M. P. (2016). The implications of slack heterogeneity for the slack-resources and corporate social performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5964–5971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.010
Shleifer, A. R. W., & Vishny. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. In Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Striukova, L., Jeffrey, U., & James, G. (2008). Corporate reporting of intellectual capital: evidence from UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 40(4), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.001
Sudibya, D. C. N. A., & Restuti, M. M. D. (2014). Pengaruh modal Intelektual terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan kinerja keuangan sebagai variabel intervening. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 18(1), 14–29. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/5210/3.pdf;sequence=1
Ulum, I., Ghozali, I., & Purwanto, A. (2014). Intellectual capital performance of Indonesian banking sector: A modified VAIC (M-VAIC) perspective. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(2), 103. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v6i2.5246
Widyaningdyah, A. U., & Aryani, Y. A. (2013). Intellectual capital dan keunggulan kompetitif (Studi empiris perusahaan manufaktur versi Jakarta Stock Industrial Classification-JASICA). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.15.1.1-14