Implementasi Business Judgment Rule Terhadap Keputusan Bisnis Direksi PT ASDP Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20961/lder.v1.i1.3761Keywords:
Business Judgment Rule, Corruption, Directors, Abuse of AuthorityAbstract
This study was prompted by the business decisions made by the board of directors of a state-owned enterprise (BUMN) implicated in corruption in Judgment No. 68/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2025/Pn Jkt Pst regarding PT ASDP’s acquisition of PT Jembatan Nusantara. This prescriptive normative legal study, employing a statutory and case-law approach, aims to examine the indicators and the judges’ ratio decidendi in applying the business judgment rule. The results of the study reveal the blurred boundaries between civil and criminal law in judicial practice. Judges tend to categorize business decisions that fulfill fiduciary duties as criminal abuse of authority. Therefore, the Supreme Court needs to issue jurisprudence as a guideline for the application of the business judgment rule so that judges can more carefully examine cases of corruption involving State-Owned Enterprises (SOE).
References
Atikah, J. “Kajian Hukum tentang Kepemilikan Modal terhadap Badan Usaha Milik Negara Menjadi Badan Usaha Milik Swasta.” Lex Crimen 5, no. 3 (2016): 57–65.
Auliya, R., S. L. Gaol, and N. Darwis. “Pandangan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia tentang Disparitas Putusan Pemidanaan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum yang Merugikan Keuangan Negara.” Iblam Law Review 4, no. 1 (2024): 99–112.
Bainbridge, Stephen M. “The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine.” Vanderbilt Law Review 57, no. 1 (2004): 83–130.
Boen, Hendra Setiawan. Bianglala Business Judgment Rule. Jakarta: PT Tatanusa, 2008.
Dewi, Sandra. “Pengaturan Perseroan Terbatas terhadap Kasus-Kasus di Berbagai Negara dalam Hal Tanggung Jawab Terbatas atau Limited Liability.” Ensiklopedia of Journal 1, no. 1 (2018): 124–33.
Fuady, Munir. Doktrin-Doktrin Modern dalam Corporate Law dan Eksistensinya dalam Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
Griffith, Sean J. “Good Faith Business Judgment: A Theory of Rhetoric in Corporate Law Jurisprudence.” Duke Law Journal 55, no. 1 (2005): 1–72.
Harefa, Beniharmoni, and Siswanto. “Konstruksi Hukum Kerugian Keuangan Negara dan Penerapan Business Judgment Rule dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2025.” Dialogia Iuridica 18, no. 1 (2026): 1–27.
Hartono, Rizky Novianto, Sriwati, and Wafia Silvi Dhesinta Rini. “Kerugian Keuangan Negara pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) dalam Perspektif Doktrin Business Judgement Rule.” Keluwih: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora 2, no. 1 (2021): 23–32.
Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Lama).
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2023 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN).
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
Khairandy, Ridwan. Perseroan Terbatas: Doktrin, Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Yurisprudensi. Edisi revisi. Yogyakarta: Total Media Yogyakarta, 2009.
Mallarangeng, Andi Bau, Mustari, Firman, and Ismail Ali. “Pembuktian Unsur Niat Dikaitkan dengan Unsur Mens Rea dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” LEGAL: Journal of Law 2, no. 2 (2023): 11–24.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Pangaribuan, Zefanya Margareth. “Tanggung Jawab Direksi terhadap Kerugian Perusahaan Berdasarkan Pasal 97 UU No. 40 Tahun 2007.” Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan 15, no. 9 (2025): 1–11.
Panjaitan, Robin, Martono Anggusti, and Roida Nababan. “Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgment Rule terhadap Direksi yang Melakukan Kebijakan yang Merugikan Perusahaan.” PATIK: Jurnal Hukum 101, no. 1 (2021): 1–14.
Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. Putusan Nomor 68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/Pn Jkt Ps.
Prayoko, Robert. Doktrin Business Judgement Rule: Aplikasinya dalam Hukum Perusahaan Modern. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2015.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. “Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Direksi dan Komisaris.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 14 (2001): 103–14.
Spithoven, Anton. “The Role of Governments in Aligning Functional Income Distribution with Full Employment.” Journal of Economic Issues 51, no. 3 (2017): 688–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2017.1359035.
Yusuf, Muhammad. “Batasan Makna tentang Itikad Baik Direksi terhadap Perseroan Terbatas.” Jurnal Mutiara Hukum 3, no. 2 (2020): 30–64.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aldiska Aqsyal Pratama, Dona Budi Kharisma (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
