PERAN PUSTAKAWAN REFERENSI SEBAGAI SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION LIBRARIAN
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Scholarly communication is the process of sharing, disseminating, and publishing research results so that academic content can be made available to the public. This study aims to examine the role of reference librarians in their involvement in supporting scholarly communication. This research was conducted using a qualitative approach with data collection through observation, literature review, and interviews involving one special library librarian. The research data were analyzed using the stages of reduction, coding, conclusion drawing, and interpretation. The results of the study show that the involvement of reference librarians in special libraries in supporting scholarly communication includes (1) providing guidance on writing good scientific papers to researchers, (2) providing journal portals; (3) processing ISSN journals that have not been registered both printed and electronic; (4) disseminating new knowledge in the form of scientific writing from the results of the researchthey manage. The results of the study do not generalize the role of special libraries but rather adjustthe functions of special libraries in managing and disseminating knowledge
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
American Library Association Office for Information Technology Policy (2013). Digital literacy, libraries, and public policy. Report of the office for information technology policy’s digital literacy task force. Retrieved from http://www.districtdispatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2012_ OITP_digilitreport_1_22_13.pdf.
American Library Association. 2006. Principles and Strategies for the Reform of Scholarly Com- munication 1. Online, (http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies), diakses 21 Juni 2018.
American Library Association. 2008. Definitions of Reference. Online, (http://www.ala.org/rusa/ guidelines/definitionsreference), diakses 21 Juni 2018.
American Library Association. 2008. Guidelines for Behavioral Performance of Reference and Information Service Providers. Online, (http://www.ala.org/rusa/resources/guidelines/guidelines- behavioral), diakses 21 Juni 2018.
Anup Kumar Das. 2015. Scholarly Communication. France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Ard, C., & Livingston, S. (2014). Reference and Research Services in Special Libraries: Navigating the Evolving Riches of Information. Journal of Library Administration, 54(6), 518–528. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.953395
Ball, R. 2011. The Scholarly Communication of the Future: From Book Information to Problem Solving. Publishing Research Quarterly Journal, Vol. 27, No.1.
Chukwusa, J., & Josephine, E. (2023). SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION CHANNELS EASILY REACHED BY LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE (LIS) STUDENTS. In UNIJERPS Unizik Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies (Vol. 15, Issue 4). https://unijerps.org
Creswell, John W. 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and Mix methods Approaches third edition. California: Sage Publication.
Das, A. K. (2015). Scholarly communications. UNESCO.
https://doi.org/10.20961/evokasi.v1i2.740 53
Direktorat Pengelolaan Kekayaan Intelektual Direktorat Jenderal Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan Kementerian riset, teknologi, dan pendidikan tinggi. 2018. Panduan Bantuan Pengelolaan Jurnal Elektronik 2018.
Finlay, C., Tsou, A., & Sugimoto, C. (2015). Scholarly Communication as a Core Competency: Prevalence, Activities, and Concepts of Scholarly Communication Librarianship as Shown Through Job Advertisements. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1236
Ghosh, S & GY. Wasley. 2002. A Special Library for Development Research - The Role of The ISS Library in Managing Information Requirements for Research. INSPEL 36(2002)36.
McClure, L. W. (2013). When the librarian was the search engine: Introduction to the special issue on new roles for health sciences librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 257–260. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.006
Nashihuddin, W. 2014. Knowledge Sharing Sebagai Upaya dan Solusi Pustakawan Referensi dalam Memenuhi Kebutuhan Informasi Pemustaka di PDII-LIPI. Jurnal Pustakawan Indonesia.
Pali UK De Silva and Candance K. 2017. Vance. Scientific Scholarly Communication: the changing landscape. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
Rachmawati, R., Nashihuddin, W., dan Anwar, S. 2017. Evaluasi Pemanfaatan Koleksi Referensi Perpustakaan PDII-LIPI. BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi. 38 (2).
Research Information Network. 2007. Research and the Scholarly Communications Process: Towards Strategic Goals for Public Policy: A Statement of Principles. London: The Association of Com- monwealth Universities.
The RUSA Professional Competencies. 2017. Professional Competencies for Reference and User Services Librarians. Online, (http://www.ala.org/rusa/resources/guidelines/professional).