The Impact of Online Learning on the Understanding of Learning Materials for Visually Impaired Students at SLB N 1 Bantul
Keywords:
Impact, learning, online, comprehension, material, visually impaired studentsAbstract
The aim of this study is to understand the impact of online learning on the comprehension of learning materials by visually impaired students at SLB N 1 Bantul. This research utilizes a qualitative approach conducted at SLB N 1 Bantul. Data collection methods include observation, interviews, and documentation. The data sources are teachers, and the data itself consists of events, interview results, and documents. The data analysis includes data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The data validation uses credibility tests, transferability tests, and dependability tests.
The research results are as follows: 1) Online learning at SLB N 1 Bantul has a positive impact on the understanding of social and science concepts by visually impaired students. Active support from teachers, parents, and the students' adaptability has been key in achieving these encouraging results; 2) Through online learning, visually impaired students at SLB N 1 Bantul are effectively able to apply learning concepts in real-life situations. Support from teachers, an inclusive learning environment, and the active role of parents have contributed to the development of their practical and analytical skills; 3) Online learning has a significant positive impact on the academic progress of visually impaired students. The improvement in understanding, participation, and critical thinking skills is clear evidence of the effectiveness of this approach. Although there are challenges in achieving the same level of progress as face-to-face learning, appropriate support from teachers and an inclusive learning environment can help visually impaired students face challenges with confidence and achieve better learning outcomes.
References
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). Academic Press.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-
Hall. Bilfaqih, Y., & Qomarudin, M. N. (2015). Esensi Penyusunan Materi
Pembelajaran Daring. Yogyakarta: Deepublish
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
Daryanto. 2016. Media Pembelajaran, Peranannya Sangat Penting Dalam Mencapai Tujuan Pembelajaran. Edisi ke-2 Revisi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Gava Media.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. Plenum.
Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4-10.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Hamalik, Oemar. 2003. Metode Belajar dan Kesulitan-kesulitas Belajar. Bandung:Remaja Karya.
Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2008). Social psychology. Prentice-Hall.
Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.
Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (2012). Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational psychologist, 48(3), 169-183.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 43-71.)
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). MIT Press.
Miarso, Yusufhadi. 2008. Menyemai Benih Teknologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya,.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
Ratumanan dan Rosmiati, Imas. 2019. Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Kota Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning, and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In J. W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.),
Semantic factors in cognition (pp. 37-53). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rusman. 2018. Belajar dan Pembelajaran, Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenamedia Group.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Simon and Schuster.
Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif,dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Suharsini Arikunto. 2003. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.)
Warsita, Bambang. 2008. Teknologi Pembelajaran, Landasan dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202-209.
Winkel, W.S. 1987. Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Pengajaran. Jakarta:Gramedia
Yaumi, Muhammad. 2019. Media dan Teknologi Pembelajaran. Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Penerbit Preanadamedia Group.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.)