The effectiveness of the STEAM-based PjBL model on students’ creative thinking skills and cognitive load in terms of self-efficacy

Authors

  • Desi Mariani Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Nurma Yunita Indriyanti Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Supurwoko Supurwoko Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20961/isep.v1i1.1769

Abstract

This study aims to (1) analyze the effectiveness of the STEAM-based PjBL model on students' creative thinking skills and cognitive load on light and optical devices (2) analyze the effect of self-efficacy on students' creative thinking skills and cognitive load on light and optical devices (3) investigate the interaction of STEAM-based PJBL models and self-efficacy on students' creative thinking skills and cognitive load on light and optical devices. This research is quasi-experimental research with a pretest-posttest control group design. The population of this study was VIII grade students at one public junior high school in Blora Regency for the 2022/2023 academic year, totaling 252 students. The sample was determined using the cluster random sampling technique; the experimental class consisted of 32 students using the PjBL STEAM learning model, and the control class consisted of 31 students using the Discovery learning model. Data collection was carried out using test techniques in the form of creative thinking skills essay questions and non-tests in the form of cognitive load and self-efficacy questionnaires. The validity test technique used is content validity. The data analysis used was the MANOVA test. In the hypothesis test, it was found that H0A was rejected (sig. 0.002 <0.05), H0B was rejected (sig. 0.001 <0.05), and H0AB was accepted (sig. 0.139 > 0.05). The conclusions obtained are (1) the learning model has an effect on creative thinking skills with the STEAM PjBL model, which has a better effect than discovery learning, (2) the learning model has an effect on students' cognitive load scores with the STEAM-PjBL model which can minimize cognitive load values which is better than the discovery learning model, (3) self-efficacy does not affect creative thinking skills but affects students' cognitive load, (4) and there is no interaction between learning models and self-efficacy on students' creative thinking skills and cognitive load. The research results can be used as study material and references for similar research on the effectiveness of STEAM-based PjBL learning models to improve students' creative thinking skills and minimize cognitive load scores in terms of self-efficacy levels for different materials.

Keywords:

project-based learning, STEAM, creative thinking skills

References

Afidah, V. N. (2015). Prinsip-Prinsip Teori Beban Kognitif Dalam Merancang Media Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika (JP2M), 1(2), 72–79.

Afrilianti, F. F., Kesumawati, N., & Hera, T. (2022). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) Terhadap Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Matematis Berdasarkan Self-Efficacy. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 3087–3096. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i3.1668

Annisa, R., Effendi, M. H., & Damris, D. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dengan menggunakan model Project Based Learning berbasis STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts Dan Mathematic) pada materi asam dan basa di SMAN 11 Kota Jambi. Journal of The Indonesian Society of Integrated Chemistry, 10(2), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.22437/jisic.v10i2.6517

Aulia, J., Fitraini, D., & Risnawati, D. (2020). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Scaffolding terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Berdasarkan Self Efficacy Siswa SMP/MTs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning, 3(4), 367–374.

Awanis, R. F., Khabibah, S., & Imah, E. M. (2023). Analisis Beban Kerja Kognitif Siswa SMP pada Tugas Aritmetika Mental. Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 509–520. http://jurnaledukasia.org

Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2, 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00024.

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Springer Science & Business Media.

Cervone, D. (2000). Thinking About Self-Efficacy. Behavior Modification, 24(1), 30–56.

Chen, C. C., & Huang, P. H. (2023). The effects of STEAM-based mobile learning on learning achievement and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 3(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1761838

Chotima, M. C., Hartono, Y., & Kesumawati, N. (2019). Pengaruh reciprocal teaching terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis ditinjau dari self-efficacy siswa. Pythagoras, 14(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i1.22375

Endah, D. R. J., Kesumawati, N., & Andinasari, A. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Berdasarkan Self Efficacy Siswa Melalui Logan Avenue Problem Solving-Heuristic. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v3i2.2331

Falah, B. N., Wijayanti, P., & Masriyah, M. (2022). Beban Kognitif Intrinsik Siswa Kepribadian Guardian dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 123–137.

Fatmah, H. (2021). Kreativitas Peserta Didik Dalam Pembelajaran Bioteknologi Dengan PjBL Berbasis STEAM. Pedagonal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(1), 7–14. http://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/pedagonal

Fitriyah, A., & Ramadani, S. D. (2021). Pengaruh pembelajaran STEAM Berbasis PjBL (Project-Based Learning) Terhadap keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dan Berpikir Kritis. Inspiratif Pendidikan, 10(1), 209–226.

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 19. . Badan Penerbitan Universitas Diponegoro.

Jatisunda, M. G. (2017). Hubungan Self-Efficacy Siswa SMP dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal Theorems (The Original Research of Mathematics), 1(2), 24–30.

Jones, D. L., & Zollman, D. (2014). Understanding vision: Students’ use of light and optics resources. European Journal of Physics, 35(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/35/5/055023

Karim, S., Kandowangko, N. Y., & Lamangantjo, C. (2022). Efektivitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Etno-STEM Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 13(2), 134–142.

Lestari, D. I., Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., & Muhammad, D. (2020). The effect of the flipped classroom approach and self-efficacy on a guided inquiry on students’ creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 12(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v12i2.19435

Lingga, L. N. M., Setiono, S., & Windyariani, S. (2022). Pengaruh Model Meaningful Instructional Design terhadap Beban Kognitif Konstruktif Siswa SMA. BIODIK, 8(4), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v8i4.19077

Mu’minah, I. H. (2020). Implementasi Steam (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematics) Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bio Education, 5(1), 65–73.

Nugroho, C. B., Fahinu, F., & Sani, A. (2018). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning dengan Pendekatan Saintifik terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematik Ditinjau dari Self-Efficacy Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 1–12.

Nurwanda, Y., Milama, B., & Yunita, L. (2020). Beban Kognitif Siswa pada Pembelajaran Kimia di Pondok …. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 14(2), 2629–2641.

Nurwulan, N. R. (2020). Pengenalan Metode Pembelajaran STEAM Kepada Para Siswa Tingkat Sekolah Dasar Kelas 1 Sampai 3. Madaniya, 1(3), 140–146. https://madaniya.pustaka.my.id/journals/contents/article/view/29

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Barchfeld, P. (2018). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contenporary Educational Psychology, 1(1), 24–29. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-137324

Pramesti, D., Probosari, R. M., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2022). Effectiveness of Project Based Learning Low Carbon STEM and Discovery Learning to Improve Creative Thinking Skills. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(3), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.156

Pudjiastuti, E. (2012). Hubungan “Self Efficacy” dengan Perilaku Mencontek Mahasiswa Psikologi. MIMBAR: Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 28(1), 103–111.

Putwain, D., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviours: Relations with learning-related emotions and academic success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02084.x

Rahman, M. K., Suharto, B., & Iriani, R. (2019). Improving Creative Thinking And Learning Results Using Steam-Based Pjbl Models In The Study Of Electrolyte And Non-Electrolyte. Journal of Chemistry And Education, 3(1), 10–22.

Rahmat, A., Soesilawaty, S. A., Fachrunnisa, R., Wulandari, S., Suryati, Y., & Rohaeni, H. (2014). Beban Kognitif Siswa SMA Pada Pembelajaran Biologi Interdisiplin Berbasis Dimensi Belajar. In Mathematics And Sciences Forum 2014.

Rahmatullah, R., Sahidu, H., & Ayub, S. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation (GI) Dengan Teknik Open-Ended Problem Terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMAN 3 MATARAM. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 3(2), 109–118.

Rahmawati, S. : A., Kusairi, S., Diantoro, & M., Analisis, ", Konsep, P., Smp, S., Cahaya, M., Optik, A., Pendidikan, J. R., Rahmawati, A., Diantoro, M., Fisika, J., Matematika, F., Ilmu, D., & Alam, P. (2021). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Siswa SMP pada Materi Cahaya dan Alat Optik. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika), 6(1), 47–54. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jrpf/

Ratnasari, G., & Sutirna, S. (2023). Analisis Beban Kognitif dalam Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa. Didactical Mathematics, 5(2), 136–144. https://ejournal.unma.ac.id/index.php/dm

Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Self-efficacy and performance feedback: Impacts on cognitive load during creative thinking. Learning and Instruction, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395

Rochmayanti, I. (2021). Pengaruh sel-efficacy terhadap beban kognitif siswa kelas x jurusan IPA di SMAN 1 Tumpang dengan emosi akademik sebagai variabel moderasi. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.

Rumasoreng, M. I. (2021). Profil beban kognitif siswa SMA selama masa pandemi covid-19. Aksioma: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3), 428–435.

Santi, E. L. (2022). Pendekatan STEAM pada project based learning mewujudkan merdeka belajar untuk meningkatkan kreativitas siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 77–81.

Sari, D. M., Ikhsan, M., & Abidin, Z. (2018). The development of learning instruments using the creative problem-solving learning model to improve students’ creative thinking skills in mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012018

Sari, E. L., Ramdhan, B., & Windyariani, S. (2020). Beban Kognitif Siswa Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan Berbantuan Prezi Application. Jurnal Biodik, 6(3), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i3.9840

Sari, F. F. (2022). Pembelajaran Dasar-Dasar Statistik Mengacu Pada Teori Beban Kognitif (Cognitive Load Theory) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar. Media Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 31–42. https://e-journal.undikma.ac.id/index.php/jmpm

Suciawati, V. (2019). Pengaruh self efficacy terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematik siswa. Jurnal Didactical Mathematics, 2(1), 17–22. http://jurnal.unma.ac.id/index.php/dm

Sukmawijaya, Y., Suhendar, S., & Juhanda, A. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran stem-pjbl terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa pada materi pencemaran lingkungan. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, 9(2), 28–43.

Sunawan, S., Yani, S. Y. A., Anna, C. T., Kencana, T. I., & Sofyan, A. (2017). Dampak Efikasi Diri terhadap Beban Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Emosi Akademik sebagai Mediator. Jurnal Psikologi, 44(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.22742

Thahura, F., & Tutdin, Z. (2021). Peran Efikasi Diri terhadap Beban Kognitif dan Stress Akademik Mahasiswa Selama Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Psikologi Konseling, 19(2), 981–987.

Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement.

Wahyuni, A. S. A. (2018). Konsepsi dan miskonsepsi siswa, mahasiswa calon guru, dan guru pada topik cahaya dalam pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(3), 235–250.

Wu, C. H., Liu, C. H., & Huang, Y. M. (2022). The exploration of continuous learning intention in STEAM education through attitude, motivation, and cognitive load. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00346-y

Yolanda, S. B., Mahardika, I. K., & Wicaksono, I. (2021). Penggunaan media video sparkol terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa pada pembelajaran ipa di smp. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v9i2.3780

Yolantia, C., Artika, W., Nurmaliah, C., & Rahmatan, H. (2021). Penerapan Modul Problem Based Learning terhadap Self Efficacy dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(4), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i4.2150

Yuniar, A. P., Hendrayana, A., & Setiani, Y. (2019). Analisis Beban Kognitif Siswa Pada Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Dalam Pokok Bahasan Perbandingan. Jurnal Penelitian Pengajaran Matematika, 1(1), 1–15

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Mariani, D., Indriyanti, N. Y., & Supurwoko, S. (2024). The effectiveness of the STEAM-based PjBL model on students’ creative thinking skills and cognitive load in terms of self-efficacy. Innovations in Science Education and Practice, 1(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.20961/isep.v1i1.1769

Issue

Section

Articles