Effectiveness of the Group Investigation (GI) learning model to increase collaboration skills and science literacy of junior high school students

Authors

  • Titik Puji Lestari Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Annisa Nur Khasanah Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Riezky Maya Probosari Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Mohammad Masykuri Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20961/1pnf1062

Keywords:

Collaboration skills, Group Investigation (GI), Science literacy

Abstract

Students' low levels of collaboration skills and scientific literacy pose challenges in science learning at the junior high school level. Science instruction in Indonesia tends to rely on lectures and minimal practical work. This study aims to analyze the effect of the Group Investigation (GI) learning model on the collaboration skills and scientific literacy of junior high school students. The study used a quasi-experimental method with a nonequivalent control group design, involving eighth grade students of junior high school in Gondangrejo in the 2024/2025 academic year. The research instruments included a GI syntax observation sheet, a collaboration skills observation sheet, and a written science literacy test. The results showed that the application of GI syntax was in the very good category (average 95.5%). The Independent Sample T-Test showed a significance value <0.05, which means the GI model has a significant effect on collaboration skills (sig. 0.000) and students' scientific literacy (sig. 0.024). These findings indicate that the GI model is effective in science learning to improve students' collaboration skills and scientific literacy.

References

Bektas, O., & Oguz Unver, A. (2022). Teachers’ effective use of time in scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 8(4), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2918

Cao, C., Zhang, T., & Xin, T. (2024). The effect of reading engagement on scientific literacy: An analysis based on the XGBoost method. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1329724. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1329724

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Costa, A. M., Ferreira, M. E., & Loureiro, M. J. d. S. (2021). Scientific literacy: The conceptual framework prevailing over the first decade of the twenty-first century. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (81), 195–228. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num81-10293

Ekizer, F. N., & Yildirim, S. S. (2023). 21st century skills and learning environments: ELT students’ perceptions. Educational Research and Reviews, 18(6), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2023.4332

Fau, J. F., Mendrofa, K. J., Wau, M., & Waruwu, Y. (2023). Pendidikan jendela dunia. Jurnal Visi Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.51622/pengabdian.v4i2.1350

Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: Perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. SAGE Publications.

Haridza, R., & Irving, K. E. (2017). The evolution of Indonesian and American science education curriculum: A comparison study. Educare, 9(2).

Hollenweger, N. C. (2024). Unlocking understanding: Enhancing scientific literacy through interdisciplinary reading strategies in high school science classes (Doctoral dissertation, Rowan University). Rowan Digital Works.

Joyce, B., & Calhoun, E. (2024). Models of teaching (10th ed.). Taylor & Francis.

Kelkay, A. D. (2023). Science practical work and its impact on students’ science achievement: The case of secondary school students. Journal of Science Education, 24(1).

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

Li, H. (2025). Impact of collaborative learning on student engagement in college English programs: Mediating effect of peer support and moderating role of group size. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1525192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1525192

Olivera, H., & Bonito, J. (2023). Practical work in science education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, Article 1151641. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1151641

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework (Updated ed.). OECD Publishing.

Sappaile, B. I., Lasinggaru, E. D. F., & Mokodenseho, S. (2023). Analyzing the influence of digital learning platforms on student engagement and academic performance. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i6.89

Shengqiang, L., Nankhantee, A., & Srikhao, S. (2025). Combining inquiry-based learning and collaborative learning: A new model for improving students’ teamwork and problem-solving skills. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 12(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v12i1.1296

Siew, N. M., & Chai, W. L. (2024). The integration of 5E inquiry-based learning and group investigation model: Its effects on level four science process skills of form four students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.133

Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2005). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. In I. B. Weiner & W. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 177–198). Wiley.

Slattery, E. J., Butler, D., O’Leary, M., & Marshall, K. (2024). Teachers’ experiences of using Minecraft Education in primary school: An Irish perspective. Irish Educational Studies, 43(4), 965–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2185276

Wele, M. A., Lawe, Y. U., Suparmi, N. W., & Dinatha, N. M. (2024). Improving scientific literacy in primary schools using experimental methods. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(2), 1114–1127. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i2.931

Zorlu, F., & Sezek, F. (2020). The investigation of the effectiveness of applying group investigation method at different intervals in teaching science courses. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 13(2), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.623066

Downloads

Published

2026-02-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Effectiveness of the Group Investigation (GI) learning model to increase collaboration skills and science literacy of junior high school students. (2026). Innovations in Science Education and Practice, 3(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.20961/1pnf1062