A Comparative Analysis of “Mei Hua” and “Han Yu” Chinese Language Textbooks

《梅花》与《汉语》汉语教材对比分析

Authors

  • Antonia Sintia Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Ina Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Yoanna Afrimonika Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20961/mandarinable.v4i1.2289

Keywords:

Comparative Analysis, Han Yu, Mei Hua, Textbook, Vocabulary and Topic

Abstract

The research title of this article is “A Comparative Analysis of “MeiHua” and “HanYu” Chinese Language Textbooks”. There are various types of Chinese Language Textbooks used by elementary school in Indonesia, two of which is “MeiHua” and “HanYu”. But not all the textbooks are completely suitable for Indonesian students, especially since Chinese is taught as a foreign language. In Chinese textbooks there are several important components, one of which is topic and vocabulary. Therefore, this study employs the literature review method and comparative analysis to examine and compare the topics and vocabulary found in the 'MeiHua' Volumes 1–6 and 'HanYu' Volumes 1–6 Chinese language textbooks, using the Chinese Proficiency Grading Standards for International Chinese Language Education as a reference. Based on the result of the research, this article found that the similarities between the two textbooks lie in the topics that frequently appear, while the differences are seen in the scope and focus of the topics taught. In terms of vocabulary, although the amount of vocabulary in both textbooks does not meet certain standards, they are still suitable for the developmental process of learning Chinese at the elementary level. In addition, MeiHua has a more balanced vocabulary distribution and is in line with YCT Level 3 objectives, while Hanyu is more in line with the needs of overseas Chinese students and follows the primary school Chinese syllabus.

References

[1] 曹正国、康晓娟、时序、焦辉郢 (2007). 《汉语》系列教材 (修订版). [出版社未提供].

[2] 查先进、杨凤 (2008). 基于对比分析法的专利情报分析实证研究. 《图书馆论坛》, (6), 193–197.

[3] 国家汉办 (2014). 《国际汉语教学通用课程大纲》(修订版). 北京语言大学出版社.

[4] 李泉 (2006). 《对外汉语教材研究》. 商务印书馆.

[5] 刘珣 (2013). 《对外汉语教育学引论》. 商务印书馆.

[6] 王天舒 (2021). 印尼西爪哇省小学汉语教材《梅花》研究 [硕士学位论文, 燕山大学]. [未提供存储库或出版社].

[7] 张肖玥 (2022). 中国国际关系定量研究方法现状分析(1990-2020)[硕士学位论文, 外交学院]. [未提供存储库或出版社].

[8] 郑珊、张婷、黄宁宁、李璐 (2016). 《新国文》与人教版小学《语文》生词对比研究. 《长春教育学院学报》, (7), 68–71.

[9] 周小兵 (2009). 《对外汉语教学入门》. 中山大学出版社.

[10] 中华人民共和国教育部、国家语言文字工作委员会 (2021). 《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》(GF 0025-2021). 北京语言大学出版社.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

A Comparative Analysis of “Mei Hua” and “Han Yu” Chinese Language Textbooks: 《梅花》与《汉语》汉语教材对比分析. (2025). Mandarinable: Journal of Chinese Studies, 4(1), 114-122. https://doi.org/10.20961/mandarinable.v4i1.2289