An Analysis of Blooket Performance in Intermediate Mandarin Reading Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20961/mandarinable.v4i2.2789Keywords:
blooket, Gamification, Mandarin language, reading skills, second language acquisitionAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of using a Blooket as a gamified learning tool in an intermediate-level Mandarin reading class. Using a descriptive quantitative approach based on User Experience (UX), additional data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and non-participatory observations. The findings reveal that the highest scores were seen in the stimulation and efficiency aspects, indicating that Blooket improves student motivation and facilitates a faster learning process. Conversely, the reliability aspect obtained the lowest score, primarily due to network instability and students’ inaccuracy in reading Chinese characters. Overall, Blooket demonstrates great potential as a foreign language learning tool. However, its implementation should be supported by a comprehensive pedagogical strategy to optimize the benefits of gamification and further develop learners’ language proficiency.
References
Chen, C., Jamiat, N., & Mao, Y. (2023). The study on the effects of gamified interactive e-books on students’ learning achievements and motivation in a Chinese character learning flipped classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1236297.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University.
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Routledge.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?--a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034.
Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97.
Huang, H.-M., Liaw, S.-S., & Lai, C.-M. (2016). Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education: a case study of desktop and projection-based display systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 3–19.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.
Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 193–210.
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112.
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning1. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., & Perera, C. J. (2024). Gamification in education. In Gamification in A Flipped Classroom: Pedagogical Methods and Best Practices (pp. 67–113). Springer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tiffany Qorie; Yogi Bagus Adhimas; Audrey Gabriella Titaley; Huiling Ren

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This permits users to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.






