Computational Thinking-Based Metacognitive Learning Assessment: Issues and Challenges

Authors

  • Fitrah Adhi Buwono Educational Technology, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Djono History Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Nur Leili Bashir Educational Technology, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Caecilia Novita Putri Educational Technology, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20961/ijolii.v3i2.2991

Keywords:

computational thinking, learning assessment, learning management system, metacognition, metacognitive scaffolding

Abstract

Metacognition is identified as the awareness and control of thinking for learning, which plays a crucial role in students' problem-solving performance. This urgency is further accentuated in the context of computational thinking, as practicing computational thinking through programming relies on problem-solvers' metacognition. However, the reality is that CT assessment is still in its infancy, particularly for formative assessment, and metacognitive strategies are often not explicitly taught. This study aims to identify critical issues and formulate further research challenges in CT-based metacognitive learning assessment. The method used is a systematic literature review to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant scientific evidence. Four main issues were identified, including the need for rigorous experimental methods to validate CT assessments, Conceptual gaps regarding whether and how CT can support the development of metacognitive strategies, Challenges in implementing more nuanced scaffolding and limited intervention duration, even though improving metacognition requires long-term learning interventions. Furthermore, there are challenges in optimizing learning management systems as metacognitive tools. Metacognitive assessments should explicitly measure cognitive regulation (planning, monitoring, and evaluation) using authentic methods, such as think-aloud. This study's contribution is to provide a structured roadmap for further research, focusing on strengthening validity, clarifying causal relationships, and optimizing digital implementations to foster students' higher-order problem-solving skills.

References

Agung, G., Parwata, L., Laba, N., & Widiana, W. (2023). Improving Metacognitive Ability and Learning Outcomes with Problem-Based Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Oriented Learning Activities. Emerging Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2023-07-02-019

Akmam, A., Hidayat, R., Mufit, F., Anshari, R., & Jalinus, N. (2023). Effect of Generative Learning Models Based on Cognitive Conflict on Students' Creative Thinking Processes Based on Metacognitive. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2582. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2582/1/012058

Amarulloh, R. R., Iqbal, N. H. M., & Aswie, V. (2025). Enhancing Deep Learning Through Computational Thinking-Based Assessment. JENTRE, 6(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.38075/jen.v6i1.539

Bonner, S., Chen, P., Jones, K., & Milonovich, B. (2021). Formative Assessment of Computational Thinking: Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes. Applied Measurement in Education, 34(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1835912

Callaway, F., Griffiths, T.L., Norman, K.A., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Optimal Metacognitive Control of Memory Recall. Psychological Review, 131(3), 781–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000441

Flavell, J. H. (2024). Theories of Learning in Educational Psychology. The Nature of Intelligence, 1979, 231–235.

Gu, P., Wu, J., Cheng, Z. Xia, Y., Cheng, M., & Dong, Y. (2025). Scaffolding self-regulation in project-based programming learning through online collaborative diaries to promote computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 16243–16267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13367-1

Hamzah, H., Hamzah, MI, & Zulkifli, H. (2022). Systematic Literature Review on the Elements of Metacognition-Based Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Teaching and Learning Modules. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14020813

Joo, K. H., & Park, N. H. (2023). Correlation Analysis Between Metacognition and Computational Thinking on Software Education. In: Ranganathan, G., EL Allioui, Y., Piramuthu, S. (eds) Soft Computing for Security Applications. ICSCS 2023. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1449. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3608-3_39

Lai, R. P. Y. (2021). Beyond Programming: A Computer-Based Assessment of Computational Thinking Competency. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 22, 2, Article 14 (June 2022), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3486598

Lei, H., Chiu, M.M., Li, F., Wang, X., & Geng, Y.-J. jing. (2020). Computational Thinking and academic achievement: A meta-analysis among students. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105439

Mahande, R. D., Darmawan, F. A., & Malago, J. D. (2021). Metacognitive skill assessment model through the blended learning management system in vocational education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v11i1.36912

Markandan, N., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2022). Integrating computational thinking and empowering Metacognitive awareness in stem education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872593

Poulakis, E., Politis, P. (2021). Computational Thinking Assessment: Literature Review. In: Tsiatsos, T., Demetriadis, S., Mikropoulos, A., Dagdilelis, V. (eds) Research on E-Learning and ICT in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64363-8_7

Şen, Ş. (2023). Relations between preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, computational thinking skills and metacognitive self-regulation. Eur J Psychol Educ 38, 1251–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00651-8

Sengul, S., & Katranci, Y. (2012). Metacognitive Aspects of Solving Function Problems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(507), 2178–2182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.450

Shin, Y., Jung, J., Choi, S., & Jung, B. (2024). The influence of scaffolding for Computational Thinking on cognitive load and problem-solving skills in collaborative programming. Educ. Inf. Technol., 30(1), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13104-0

Silva, D. R., Kurtz, F. D., & de Araújo, M. C. P. (2023). A Metacognição e o Pensamento Computacional na Perspectiva Histórico-Cultural de Vygotsky. Revista Espaço Pedagógico, 30, e15264. https://doi.org/10.5335/rep.v30.15264

Stanton, J.D., Sebesta, A.J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE Life Sciences Education, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/CBE.20-12-0289

Sudadi, S., Lolang, E., Ariawan, J., Kusnadi, IH, & Munir, M. (2023). The Effectiveness Analysis of Computational Thinking Patterns and Levels of Students' Meta-Cognitive Awareness in Solving Learning Problems. Journal on Education, 6(1), 2166–2171. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3217

Ubaidullah, N. H., Mohamed, Z., Hamid, J., Sulaiman, S., & Yussof, R. L. (2021). Improving novice students’ computational thinking skills by problem-solving and Metacognitive techniques. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(6), 88-108. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.6.5

ÜZÜMCÜ, Ö. (2023). Computational thinking scale: The predictive role of metacognition in the context of higher order thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 11(3), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1355722

Wang, C., Shen, J. & Chao, J. (2022). Integrating Computational Thinking in STEM Education: A Literature Review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 1949–1972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10227-5

Wang, C.Y., Gao, B.L., & Chen, S.J. (2024). The effects of metacognitive scaffolding of project-based learning environments on students' metacognitive abilities and Computational Thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 5485–5508. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-023-12022-X

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Yadav, A., Ocak, C., & Oliver, A. (2022). Computational Thinking and Metacognition. TechTrends, 66, 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00695-z

Zarouk, M.Y., & Khaldi, M. (2016). Metacognitive learning management system supporting self-regulated learning. Colloquium in Information Science and Technology, CIST, 0, 929–934. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIST.2016.7805021

Zhang, J., Zhou, Y., Jing, B., Pi, Z., & Ma, H. (2024). Metacognition and Mathematical Modeling Skills: The Mediating Roles of Computational Thinking in High School Students. Journal of Intelligence, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE12060055

Zhang, W., Guan, Y., Hu, Z. et al. (2025). Synergistic approaches in education: elevating computational thinking and metacognitive skills through combined project-based and pair programming learning in high schools. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10555-1

Zhou, Y., Chai, C.S., Li, X., Ma, C., Li, B., Yu, D., & Liang, J.C. (2023). Application of Metacognitive Planning Scaffolding for the Cultivation of Computational Thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(6), 1123–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231160294

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Buwono, F. A., Djono, Bashir, N. L., & Putri, C. N. (2025). Computational Thinking-Based Metacognitive Learning Assessment: Issues and Challenges. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instructional Innovation, 3(02), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijolii.v3i2.2991

Similar Articles

1-10 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)