Assistance with CIPP Model-Based Curriculum Evaluation to Support Quality Assurance in Vocational Education Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20961/ijecs.v1i2.3949Keywords:
CIPP Evaluation, Quality Management, Vocational Education, Curriculum GovernanceAbstract
Enhancing the quality of vocational education requires structured curriculum monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to ensure alignment with labor market needs and current educational governance standards. However, administrators and educators in vocational institutions often face challenges in conducting internal evaluations based on a systematic framework. This community service initiative aims to improve the understanding and skills of administrators and educators in evaluating curriculum governance using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model, thereby supporting institutional quality assurance readiness. The implementation methods included dissemination, identification of partner challenges, a workshop on developing evaluation instruments, mentoring, and program evaluation. The results indicate an increase in participants' understanding of CIPP evaluation, with the average score rising from 54.2% in the pre-test to 88.6% in the post-test. Participants also successfully drafted internal quality evaluation documents that are adaptable to evolving educational management standards. This program has positively impacted the strengthening of quality assurance mechanisms within the vocational learning system and supports the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 regarding quality education.
References
Andin, C. (2023). Curriculum Reform of "Woven Fabric Structure Design and Application" in Higher Vocational College Based on Industry-College Partnerships. Sociology Study, 13(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5526/2023.02.003
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dias, A. M. A., Almeida, L., Blaga, M., Radulescu, R., Malengier, B., Stjepanović, Z., & Dufkova, P. (2019). Guide for Smart Practices to Support Innovation in Smart Textiles. Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3562104
Faura, B., López, M., & Romero, L. (2019). Analysis of the ISO 21001:2018 standard for educational organizations: Contributions and challenges. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(3), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-11-2018-0121
Firmansyah, A., Pratama, R., & Hidayat, T. (2022). Efektivitas Workshop Pendampingan Berbasis Clinic System dalam Penyusunan Dokumen SPMI Perguruan Tinggi Vokasi. Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 6(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.30595/jppm.v6i2.11204
Gilbert, C. (2020). Integrating ISO 21001 in Higher Education Institutions: Benefits and Challenges. Journal of Educational Management, 18(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2020.1712345
Handayani, S., Nugroho, A., & Kusuma, D. (2023). Integrasi Model CIPP dalam Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Model Pembelajaran Dual System di Perguruan Tinggi Vokasi. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi, 4(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.25105/jpmpt.v4i1.14321
Jansen, H. (2019). The Use of Qualitative Surveys in Research: An Introduction. Survey Methodology, 45(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2308/surv-meth-19-020
Kurniawan, E., & Arifin, Z. (2021). Evaluasi Kurikulum Vokasi Berbasis CIPP untuk Menyelaraskan Kompetensi Lulusan dengan Kebutuhan Dunia Kerja. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi dan Kejuruan, 10(3), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpvk.v10i3.38912
Laksana, B. S., & Hermawan, A. (2022). Transformation of Quality Assurance Culture in Vocational Higher Education: A Participatory Approach. Journal of Educational Administration and Management, 5(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.17509/jeam.v5i2.45102
Nguyen, H. T. L. (2023). Faculty Members' Perceptions toward Accreditation Process in Public Universities in Indonesia Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, Article 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100234
Nugroho, Y., & Anwar, H. (2018). Implementasi Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI) di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.21009/JMP.v3i2.8841
Prasetyo, E., & Suwandi, S. (2021). Strategi penguatan pendidikan vokasi dalam menghadapi tantangan era industri 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Indonesia, 9(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v9i1.34120
Quang, T. T., Pimpa, N., & Burgess, J. (2020). Skill Development: Vocational Education Institutions & Industry Engagement in the Garment and Textile Industry. Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(4), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20200804.18
Rahmadi, R., & Iskandar, I. (2020). Implementing ISO 21001:2018 in Higher Education: A Case Study. Journal of Quality Assurance in Education, 28(2), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-04-2019-0043
Setiawan, R., Zarror, A. F., & Istikowati, R. (2023). Analisis Model Evaluasi CIPP dan Manajemen Mutu Pada AK-Tekstil Solo. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instructional Innovation (IJOLII/IJECS), 5(1), 1–12. https://journal.uns.ac.id/ijolii/article/view/45821
Setyawati, H. (2017). Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v2i1.512
Setyowati, E., & Rahmawati, I. (2023). Peningkatan Kapasitas Dosen dalam Penyusunan Instrumen Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Outcome-Based Education (OBE). Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 8(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpkm.72019
Sitorus, T. (2021). National Standards in Higher Education and ISO 21001:2018: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1772102
Smith, J. (2023). The Importance of Vocational Education in the Modern Workforce. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 75(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2023.2189001
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2014). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam, & L. A. Wingate (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. (2012). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2012 Nomor 158. https://peraturan.go.id/id/uu-no-12-tahun-2012
Wibowo, H., Santoso, M., & Utami, P. (2024). Aligning Vocational Education Curriculum with Industry 4.0 Standards Using the CIPP Evaluation Model. International Journal of Vocational Education Research, 7(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijver.2023.100189
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-Learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/842
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amirulhuda Nawasaptaaji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
