Descriptive Analysis of the Edutainment Program For Your Pagi on Trans7 in Improving Teenager Digital Literacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20961/ijolii.v4i01.3656Keywords:
ARCS Model, Digital Literacy, Edutainment, Learning Resources, TeenagersAbstract
This study aims to describe and analyze the strategic utilization of the For Your Pagi (FYP) edutainment program on Trans7 in improving teenager digital literacy. Employing a qualitative approach with a qualitative descriptive design, this research gathered data through a purposive sampling technique involving four primary informants: two internal media practitioners (the producer and creative team member of Trans7) and two external informants (teenagers aged 17–20). Data collection techniques were rigorously executed via semi-structured interviews, participatory observation during the researcher’s embedded internship, and documentation studies of broadcasting scripts and actual televised episodes. Data validity was ensured through source and technique triangulation, and analysis was systematically performed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings reveal that the FYP program effectively deploys educational message design strategies within a non-formal broadcasting environment by systematically integrating John Keller’s ARCS Motivation Model (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction). This structural edutainment balance exhibits a verifiable impact on accelerating the digital literacy competencies of teenagers based on the four pillars of Paul Gilster’s Theory. However, a significant operational constraint persists.
References
AECT. (2004). Educational technology: A definition with commentary (1st ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates for AECT.
Akbar, A., & Noviani, N. (2019). Tantangan dan Solusi dalam Perkembangan Teknologi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 2(1), 18–25.
Amalia, R. N., Indriani, S. S., & Mahameruaji, J. N. (2022). Resepsi khalayak pada program acara televisi di Trans 7 sebagai media edukasi. ProTVF, 6(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.24198/ptvf.v6i1.36061
Arsyad, A. (2013). Media Pembelajaran. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall.
Colace, F., De Santo, M., & Pietrosanto, A. (2006). Edutainment: A New Methodology for Learning. 36th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE ’06), 1–6.
Coombs, P. H., & Ahmed, M. (1974). Attacking Rural Poverty: How Nonformal Education Can Help. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Febriansyah, R. (2023). Strategi Komunikasi dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Literasi Media Digital pada Televisi di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. JSIM: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 4(1).
Fitriyani, F., & Teguh Nugroho, A. (2022). Literasi Digital Di Era Pembelajaran Abad 21. Literasi Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Inovasi, 2(1), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.58466/literasi.v2i1.1416
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. John Wiley & Sons.
Handayani, R. M. D. P. R. (2023). Teknologi Pendidikan (M. P. Andri Cahyo Purnomo, Ed.).
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229.
Indonesia, N. (2023). Nielsen: TV Masih Mendominasi Audiens Indonesia. https://www.nielsen.com/id/news-center/2023/streaming-and-digital-on-the-rise-in-asia/
Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates for AECT.
Judijanto, L. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Tingkat Literasi Digital Guru dan Siswa terhadap Kualitas Pembelajaran di Era Digital di Indonesia. Sanskara Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 2(02), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.58812/spp.v2i02.391
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and Use of the ARCS Model of Instructional Design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10.
Komalasari, K., & Saripudin, D. (2018). Living Values Education in School Habituation Program and Its Effect on Student’s Character Development. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 51–65.
Kominfo. (2022). Survei Indeks Literasi Digital Indonesia 2020–2023.
Kuswandi, W. (1996). Komunikasi Televisi: Arsitektur Budaya Massa. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Lestari, C. A., & Dwijayanti, R. I. (2020). Rendahnya Literasi Digital di Kalangan Siswa. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 1.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nur’Aini, I. (2022). Penerapan Edutainment Dalam Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Jurnal Tawadhu, 6(2), 1–23.
Pahlevi, R. (2022). Survei KIC: Masyarakat Lebih Percaya Televisi dan Media Sosial Ketimbang Situs Resmi Pemerintah. Databoks.Katadata.Co.Id
Pribadi, B. A. (2011). Model Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Dian Rakyat.
Rusman. (2012). Belajar dan Pembelajaran: Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sandlin, J. A., O’Malley, M. P., & Burdick, J. (2011). Mapping the Terrain of Public Pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 338–375.
Saptya, R., Permana, M., Abdullah, A., & Mahameruaji, N. (2019). Budaya Menonton Televisi di Indonesia: Dari Terrestrial Hingga Digital. ProTVF, 3(1), 53–67.
Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping Theory. Routledge.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Surani, D. (2019). Peran Teknologi Pendidikan dalam Pendidikan 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(1), 456–469.
UNESCO. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO.
Ziep, O. (2014). Edutainment as a Modern Technology of Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 475–479.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ikhsanul Alhafizh, Fatma Sukmawati, Faris Farabi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
